Graduate
   Advancement                              Computer Information Systems
   Program

         

 

 
    About Mike
   
    Research
         Research Philos.- TBA
         Publications
         Dissertation Abstr-TBA
     
    Teaching
         Teaching Philosophy
         Teaching Journal
         Teaching Videos
         Student Comments
 

    Service

         Leadership

         Reviewing

  
    Curriculum Vitae
         Degrees/Certifications
         PDF   Version - TBA
         HTML Version
    

    Home

    

    GAP Fellows Home

        
    Updated 05/15/2006
        
        
   
 
 
 

Publications

Peer Reviewed Journals

 

1.  Cuellar, M.J.. & Gallivan, M.J.. (2005) “A Framework for Ex Ante Project Risk Assessment based on Absorptive Capacity”. European Journal of Operational Research.

 

Conference Proceedings: Refereed

 

1. Cuellar, M.J. (Aug, 2006) "What is Critical Realism? A General Introduction To Its Concepts and Implications for Research" 66th Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 11-16, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia.

 

2. Takeda, H., Cuellar, M.J., and Ding, Y. (April, 2006) "An Experimentation of Computer Mediated Communication and Face to Face Group Tasks with Differential Equivocality" UKAIS 11th Annual Conference on Information Systems, April 10-11, 2006, University of Gloucestershire, UK.

 

3. Cuellar, M.J., McLean, E., and Johnson, R.D. (April, 2006) "Measurement of Information System Usage" SIGMIS-CPR06 Conference on Computer Personnel Research , April 13-16, Claremont, CA.

 

4. Cuellar, M.J. & Johnson, R.D. (October 2005) "Information Systems and Organizational Knowledge", ICKM2005 - International Conference on Knowledge Management, October 27-28, 2005, Charlotte, NC.

 

5. Cuellar, M. J. & Johnson, R. D. & Du, S. M. (February 2005) “Task Structure and the Propensity to Collaborate vs. Cooperate.” Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS), Savannah, Georgia.

 

Publications: Non-Refereed and Other

 

1. Cuellar, M. J. (April, 2001) "The line design dilemma." MIDRANGE Enterprise.

 

2. Cuellar, M. J. (September, 2000) "Demand and Resource Management in Lean
Manufacturing." Flow Manufacturing Report.

 

3. Cuellar, M. J. (March, 2000) "Flow Supports e-Business." Flow Manufacturing Report. 

 

Work-In-Progress

1. Cuellar, M. J., Keil, M., & Johnson, R. D. “The Deaf Effect on Decision Making in Project Management.”
Investigating the deaf effect (why decisionmakers don't hear, ignore or overrule the concerns of whistleblowers) response to whistleblowing. We propose a model using Miceli and Near's theory on whistleblowing effectiveness and Evans’ decisionmaking theory as an underlying mechanisms. We performed an exploratory study of 80 students in a scenario experiment. To collect another 15-20 subjects and then analyze the data.

 

2. Cuellar, M.J "A Rigorous Critical Realist Explanatory Research Methodology" Extending the conference paper submitted before, this article overviews critical realism and the current proposals for explanatory research based on CR and then proposes an upgrade to those proposals and a set of standards for research practice and reviewing.

 

3. Cuellar, M.J., McLean, E. and Johnson, R.D. "Redefinition and Metrics for the Systems Usage Construct"
We redefine the systems usage construct as "the extent to which the system is incorporated into the user’s (individual, group, or organization) work processes." Extending the conference paper submitted above, we defined a set of metrics and a process to collect data for those metrics. A field study is in process to test the metrics.

 

4. Cuellar, M. J., Johnson, R. D. "Task Structure and the Propensity to Collaborate"
Follow-on research with improved survey instruments to investigate the the effect of task structure on the motivation of students to collaborate vs cooperate in class team work to the conference paper submitted above.We define collaboration as students working synchronously to accomplish a task as opposed to asynchronously. We collected information from several undergraduate classes on how students view the structure of tasks and how they spend their time during projects. Now analyzing the data.